Quarter-dose of Moderna COVID vaccine still rouses a big immune response

Nature

  • NEWS

A mini-dose of COVID vaccine still rouses a big immune response

Three health workers fill syringes with the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination center in Tokyo.

Workers prepare doses of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine.Credit: Eugene Hoshiko/AP/Shutterstock

A little bit of coronavirus vaccine goes a long way towards generating lasting immunity.

Two jabs that each contained only one-quarter of the standard dose of the Moderna COVID vaccine gave rise to long-lasting protective antibodies and virus-fighting T cells, according to tests in nearly three dozen people1. The results hint at the possibility of administering fractional doses to stretch limited vaccine supplies and accelerate the global immunization effort.

Since 2016, such a dose-reduction strategy has successfully vaccinated millions of people in Africa and South America against yellow fever2. But no similar approach has been tried in response to COVID-19, despite vaccine shortages in much of the global south.

“There’s a huge status quo bias, and it’s killing people,” says Alex Tabarrok, an economist at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. “Had we done this starting in January, we could have vaccinated tens, perhaps hundreds, of millions more people.”

The just-right dose?

In the earliest trial of Moderna’s mRNA-based vaccine, study participants received one of three dose levels: 25, 100 or 250 micrograms3. The top dose proved too toxic. The low dose elicited the weakest immune response. The middle dose seemed to offer the best balance: it triggered strong immunity and had acceptable side effects.

That 100-microgram dose ultimately became the one authorized for mass use in dozens of countries. But Moderna scientists later showed that a half-dose seemed to be just as good as the standard dose at stimulating immune protection4.

To find out whether a low dose might offer protection, scientists analysed blood from 35 participants in the original trial. Each had received two 25-microgram jabs of vaccine 28 days apart.

Six months after the second shot, nearly all of the 35 participants had ‘neutralizing’ antibodies, which block the virus from infecting cells, the researchers reported in a preprint published on 5 July1. Participants’ blood also contained an armada of different T cells, both ‘killer’ cells that can destroy infected cells and a variety of ‘helper’ cells that aid in general immune defence.

Levels of both antibodies and T cells were comparable to those found in people who have recovered from COVID-19.

“It is quite remarkable — and quite promising — that you can easily detect responses for that long a time,” says Daniela Weiskopf, an immunologist at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI) in California and a co-author of the study, which has not yet been peer reviewed.

Corine Geurts van Kessel, a clinical virologist at the Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, who was not involved in the study, agrees. “It’s rather good news,” she says. “Even with a low dose, you can prime your own immune system in quite a nice way.”

Weiskopf and her study co-author Shane Crotty, also at LJI, are among the scientists who would prefer carefully planned trials to confirm the efficacy of reduced vaccine doses before any such regimen is widely deployed. One such trial is ongoing: a study in Belgium is comparing a lower-dose version of the vaccine from Pfizer–BioNTech against the standard dose.

But Sarah Cobey, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of Chicago in Illinois and a co-author of a 5 July Nature Medicine commentary5 supporting dose ‘fractionation’, disagrees about the need for time-consuming data collection.

“We shouldn’t wait that long,” she says. “People are dying, and we have historical precedent for making very well-reasoned guesses that we think are going to save lives.”

Less is more

Even if the immune responses spurred by the low-dose strategy are only moderately effective at keeping SARS-CoV-2 at bay, it could still be worth giving quarter doses to speed up the pace of vaccination around the world, argues Tabarrok.

According to a modelling study published by Tabarrok and other economists, such an approach would reduce infections and COVID-linked deaths more than current policies6. The study has not yet been peer reviewed.

A half-dose now is more useful to an unvaccinated person than a full dose a year from now, Tabarrock says, which means that dose-stretching “is a way of promoting vaccine equity.”

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01893-0

References

  1. 1.

    Mateus, J. et al. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.30.21259787 (2021).

  2. 2.

    Casey, R. M. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 444–454 (2019).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  3. 3.

    Jackson, L. A. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1920–1931 (2020).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  4. 4.

    Chu, L. et al. Vaccine 39, 2791–2799 (2021).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  5. 5.

    Cowling, B. J. et al. Nature Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01440-4 (2021).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  6. 6.

    Więcek, W. et al. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3864485 (2021).

Download references

Subjects

Nature Careers


Jobs


Nature Briefing

An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.





Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Tesla to reverse solar price hike for some customers, legal filing says
India X Cleantech — September 2021
COVID vaccine immunity is waning — how much does that matter?
Satellite operators need more accurate SSA data
China faces one–two punches of extreme weather as Earth warms

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *